Megafauna —

First Victims of the Human-Caused Extinction
Baz Edmeades
Home Footnotes Author

 

Chapter 5

Lost Serengetis 2: Australia and North America

While I was writing this chapter, I heard the presenter of a TV show about Australian wildlife tell his viewers that “before man arrived in Australia, the kangaroo had no enemies.”

Nothing could be further from the truth. When the first humans arrived in Australia somewhere in the neighborhood of fifty thousand years ago, kangaroos were in fact being preyed on by a marsupial “lion” called Thylacoleo carnifex. Until recently, it was thought that Thylacoleo was a leopard-sized animal, but evidence marshaled by Stephen Wroe of the University of New South Wales suggests that might have been closer in size to a female lion or tiger. Barring the discovery of a painting or engraving of Thylacoleo, we’ll never know what kind of markings it had.

Thylacoleo was more of a “rat-bear” than a cat – the animal’s body was stocky and muscular rather than lithe. Two big incisor teeth pressed against each other in a rodent-like way in front of each of its jaws to form a kind of “beak” for seizing its prey. Behind the remaining incisors – which were small – lay huge premolars which had developed into long carnassials or “meat cutting” blades. The front ends of the upper carnassials ended in a pair of low “summits” that could, at a quick glance, look like the canine teeth which were absent or undeveloped in this animal. The teeth situated behind the carnassials were also small. The toes of this big marsupial predator were equipped with claws, two of which, situated on powerful opposing “thumbs,” were retractable.

Thylacoleo may not have been particularly cat-like, but the wolf-sized marsupial predator Thylacinus cynocephalus was astonishingly and faithfully dog-like. Named “Tasmanian wolf” because of this resemblance, Thylacinus was only “Tasmanian” in the sense that a somewhat dwarfed, coyote-sized version of this animal survived on the island of Tasmania until it was exterminated in the nineteen-thirties by the British colonists who had exterminated the island’s original human inhabitants during the previous century. Thylacinus had, along with the “Tasmanian” devil Sarcophilus harrisi, become extinct on the Australian mainland about 3,500 years ago, soon after the dingo, a placental or “real” dog, was brought to Australia by humans (long after the first wave of human immigration). By that time, however, Tasmania, which had, like New Guinea, been joined to Pleistocene Australia, had already been cut off from Australia by the post-glacial rise in the sea level, so the dingo (whose competition Thylacinus could not, apparently, survive) couldn’t make it there.

Film footage of Thylacinus, taken in a zoo in the early thirties, shows an animal which looked like, and trotted like, a dog. Given the fact that “real” wolves are much more closely related to sheep (or to whales or bats, for that matter) than they are to this marsupial “wolf,” the shape and arrangement of their 42 teeth is remarkably similar to that of Thylacinus’ 46. Among the few obvious details which betrayed the fact that Thylacinus was completely unrelated to the dog family to which it bore such a remarkable resemblance, were a tail which was thicker at its base than the tails of “real” dogs, and jaws which could open much wider. Thylacinus’ “pups” were carried in a backward-facing pouch. The hind end of the animal’s back, including the thick base of its tail, was covered with about twenty dark, parallel stripes. Because of these stripes, some people have taken to referring to Thylacinus as the Tasmanian “tiger,” but that name obscures the animal’s remarkable evolutionary convergence with the dog family.

The extermination of Thylacinus has left only three small marsupial predators in Australia: the terrier-sized “Tasmanian” devil, and several mongoose-like “quolls” in the genus Dasyures.

* * *

Australia’s extinct “wolves,” “lions” (and a 90 lb. carnivorous “rat-kangaroo” called Proleopus oscillans) represented only that subcontinent’s medium-sized predators. Its largest flesh-eaters were all reptiles. One of the most remarkable of these, was a huge monitor lizard called Megalania prisca. Megalania was considerably bigger than its surviving relative, the “Komodo dragon” which can grow up to 10 feet long, and inhabits a few Indonesian islands near Australia’s northern coast.

Other big reptilian predators living in Australia when humans first arrived there were the outsized “python” Wonambi, and a long-legged crocodile called Quinkana. The length of the latter’s legs, and fact that its tail was rounded in cross-section rather than flat-sided like the tails of water-dwelling crocodiles, suggest that Quinkana lived and hunted on land. Australia also had several species of water-dwelling crocodile, of which two have survived. The larger of these two survivors, Crocodylus porosus, which occasionally reaches eighteen feet in length, is presently the world’s largest reptile.

These big reptilian predators would certainly have killed kangaroos, but they would also have focused their efforts on larger prey, like Australia’s marsupial “rhinos.” Those “rhinos” were members of the “Diprotodonid” group, one of whose genera, Diprotodon, consisted of two or more species that were as big or bigger than a black rhinoceros. Australia’s biggest predators would also have targeted a buffalo-sized marsupial called Zygomaturus, and the very strange Palorchestes, a one-ton marsupial “ground sloth” which could balance on its powerful tail and hind limbs like a kangaroo while reaching up with the huge, curved claws on its forelimbs to pull trees and branches into the reach of what was possibly a short, tapir-like trunk.

The mammalian and reptilian predators we’ve been talking about would also have preyed on seven species of “giant short-faced” kangaroos which disappeared along with the “rhino,” “buffalo,” and “ground-sloth” analogs I’ve just mentioned. Eight large species of “ordinary” kangaroos, and five large wombat species were also exterminated or dwarfed – possibly by the mechanism we discussed in Chapter 1.

Add to this fanciful collection of extinct giants a family of horned tortoises in the genus Meiolania, whose largest species reached a weight of 500 lb. Include with them, too, a list of extinct birds which contains, inter alia, two flamingo species, a pelican, one or more giant eagle species, flightless cuckoos, flightless pilot birds, a giant “mallee fowl,” and the 450 lb. Genyornis newtoni “ostrich,” and you can begin to get an idea of the enormous impoverishment the Australian fauna has experienced in what Paul Martin refers to “near time” – i.e. the last fifty thousand years.

* * *

In the year 2001, a study initiated by Tim Flannery and Richard Roberts, and based on a dating technique known as “optically stimulated luminescence,” singled out the millennium between 46,000 and 47,000 years ago as the time when many species of Australian megafauna died out abruptly over a wide area of that island-continent.

These findings are in broad agreement with the results of a 1999 study by Gifford Miller of the University of Colorado, who used another dating technique – Amino Acid Racemisation – to establish that the youngest egg-shell fragments of the giant Genyornis “ostrich,” are between 45,000 and 55,000 years old.

Fire played a very different role in the ecology of Australia after humans reached that island continent. Whether they do so by accident, or to signal other groups, or to help their hunting or stimulate fresh plant growth, humans start plenty of fires. The result was that, relatively soon after the arrival of our species in Northern Australia, dry forests dominated by Araucaria trees were supplanted by plant communities dominated by eucalypts, which “rely” on fire to help them compete against plants which are more vulnerable to it than they are. Using sophisticated “pre-treatment” strategies for removing contaminants in his samples, Chris Turney of Queen’s University in Belfast pushed the horizon of the radiocarbon method back from forty thousand to sixty thousand years, to establish that an abrupt increase in burning, and an accompanying change in vegetation, had taken place in Queensland sometime between 45,000 and 55,000 years ago.

The dating of archeological material from Arnhem land, on the other side of the Gulf of Carpentaria, under the direction of the late Professor Rhys M. Jones of the Australian National University, suggests, however, that humans had been present in that area as long as 60,000 years ago.

* * *

While Australia’s extinct megafauna disappeared on the edge of the 40 thousand-year “window” in which radiocarbon dating is effective, the New World’s “Serengetis” of big animals and birds became extinct well inside that window – near the start, to be more precise, of the “Younger Dryas” cold phase some 12,870 “calendar,” or 11,200 “radiocarbon” years ago.

Let’s talk briefly – before we return to the issue of when North America’s megafaunal extinction took place – about why the radiocarbon date I’ve mentioned in the preceding paragraph is so far out of step with the calendar or “real” date it represents.

Radiocarbon dating is based on the assumption that the amount of C14 in the atmosphere remains constant. That assumption doesn’t hold in the real world. Variations in the Earth’s magnetic field, and in cosmic background radiation, affect the rate at which C14 is being “manufactured” in the atmosphere. The big, back-and-forth lurches in temperature that took place near the end of the last glaciation muddied the picture further, by causing sudden and relatively large variations in the ratio of C12 to C14 in the atmosphere. Those variations make time, as measured by radiocarbon dating, appear to speed up, slow down and even run backward for brief intervals. We’re dependent, therefore, on data gleaned from lake sediments, annual precipitation layers in ancient ice, tree-ring sequences and other dating methods to produce “calibrated” or “calendar” dates from the radiocarbon results.

All the dates mentioned in this book are, unless I’ve indicated otherwise, expressed in calibrated or calendar rather than in radiocarbon years.

* * *

Although the New World’s “Serengetis” disappeared, as we’ve just seen, well within the radiocarbon dating window, many of their members lack the kind of radiometric records that are needed to calculate the dates of their last appearances with any degree of precision. Reliable radiometric histories are only available for some 15 of the approximately 35 genera of mammals weighing over 100 lb. which North America lost near the end of the Pleistocene. Those measurements tell us that those 15 genera all became extinct between 11,400 and 10,800 radiocarbon years – i.e. between 13,000 and 12,400 calendar years – before the present.

Some of the remaining 20 genera may have became extinct before or after that 600-year-long spate of more or less securely-dated extinctions, but the picture that emerges is, nevertheless, one in which North America loses a megafauna which was much richer, as I’ve said, than that of present-day Africa, in something like a thousand years – a millisecond of geological time.

The fact that somewhere between 30 and 70 million bison were living on the prairies of North America in the early nineteenth century demonstrates the fact of this catastrophic impoverishment rather than casting doubt upon it: Bison bison could never have become as plentiful as it was in the 1840s while it was still sharing the prairies of the “American Serengeti” with a dozen other large herbivore species (including its relative Bison latifrons). The real Serengeti contains, for instance, a great many wildebeest (1.4 million of them still live there), but the entire, Africa-wide population of the blue wildebeest (the species that lives on the Serengeti) could never have come near to the Nineteenth-century abundance of Bison bison. This is so because blue wildebeests have always had to share the resources of the African veld with relatives like black wildebeests, hartebeests, topis, tsessabies and blesboks, and a host of unrelated grass-eaters ranging from elephants through white rhinoceroses to oryxes.

The population of the one surviving American bison species, artificially boosted by the extermination of most of America’s big animals between thirteen and twelve thousand years ago, was further inflated after the fifteenth century A.D., when a large proportion of North America’s human population was wiped out by the introduction of smallpox and other Eurasian diseases. The enormous bison herds of the mid-nineteenth century were, therefore, (in the words of Colin Tudge’s Time Before History) “an artifact – like a rash of ragwort on a bombsite.”

* * *

When humans first entered North America, at least one cheetah species, Miracinonyx trumanii was living there. (Two older American cheetah species, M. studeri, and M. inexpectata had probably drifted into “natural” extinction – i. e. extinction not caused by our species – by that time.) The American cheetahs probably focused their predatory efforts on the pronghorn and forked-horn “antelope” species that were America’s equivalent of Africa’s gazelles, because the only surviving member of the pronghorn/four-horn group, Antilocapra americana, is still one of the fastest-running hoofed animals in the world. Evolution would never have made the enormous investment in the circulatory, respiratory and muscular-skeletal development required for that kind of speed without a pressing reason for doing so.

The cat family originated in Eurasia/Africa, but a member of that family which reached North America in the early Miocene, probably over the newly-formed Bering land bridge, founded the cheetah-cougar family in its new homeland.

The idea that the cheetah’s closest living relative is the cougar or puma may seem surprising at first. The two species are, after all, widely separated from each other geographically at present. They’re also widely separated in terms of human-created classification or “taxonomy.” We’ve assigned the cheetah, whose adaptation to fast running has left it with unhooked, dog-like claws that can’t be fully retracted, into the separate genus Acinonyx or “unmoving-claw,” while leaving cougars, who can retract their claws, in the genus Felis together with other cats who possess this power, like lynxes and house cats.

The fact that cheetahs and cougars are each other’s closest relatives becomes obvious, however, on more focused consideration: both species have small, rounded heads and long, relatively heavy tails; neither can roar, but both can chatter in squeaky, bird-like voices. The black “tear marks” running from the inner corners of the cheetah’s eyes down to the corners of its mouth, are echoed by prominent black smudges on the same area of the cougar’s face. The cheetah’s spots, too, resemble those which adorn juvenile cougars: they’re solid dots rather than the very different “rosettes” or “clusters of spots” displayed by jaguars, leopards, adolescent lions and many of the smaller cats.

End-Pleistocene North America was inhabited, too, by lions and jaguars. The former species was similar to, or identical with the lions which still inhabit Africa and a small part of India. For reasons we spoke about in Chapter 1, both the lions and the jaguars were, however, about 25% bigger than the present-day members of their species.

In addition to the big cat species I’ve just mentioned – which still exist somewhere on the planet if not in North America itself – Pleistocene North America was inhabited by two large felids which have become completely, rather than just locally, extinct: the saber-tooth Smilodon, and the “scimitar-tooth” Homotherium. Smilodon was a closely-related descendant of the Megantereon sabertooth which had lived, (along with Homotherium and the “dirk-tooth” Dinofelis) in Africa until some 1.4 million years ago.

In Chapters 12 to 14 of this book, I’ll argue that sabertooths disappeared from Africa at this early date because hominids had, by that time, begun to dominate the business of hunting large prey effectively enough to shut out other predators that were dependent on such prey. If I’m right about this, the relatively late arrival of hominids in Europe would explain why sabertooth cats survived there long after they had become extinct in Africa. (Megantereon only disappeared from Europe some 800,000 years ago, while Homotherium made its last appearance as recently as 25,000 years ago, when our kind of human, Homo sapiens, was already taking possession of that continent.) The fact that the hominid family – in the person of Homo sapiens – only entered the New World near the end of the Pleistocene, would explain, too, why Megantereon (in its Smilodon avatar) and Homotherium survived there until that very recent time.

The six big-cat species we’ve been talking about shared end-Pleistocene North America with four dog-like species: the coyote, the “ordinary” wolf, a more heavily-built “dire” wolf, and the dhole – a wild dog which is still found in Asia.

The still-surviving black bear also lived in North America when humans arrived there, as did the grizzly bear. Although it’s considerably larger than a lion, the grizzly wasn’t the biggest predator to inhabit the New World when our species first arrived there: that position was held by the giant short-faced bear Arctodus, which was probably the largest land-dwelling carnivorous mammal ever to exist. “Awesome” became an overused word toward the end of the Twentieth Century, but Arctodus, equipped with long legs adapted to running pursuit, must truly have been an awesome animal. A fourth bear species, Tremarctos floridanus, was living in North America when humans first arrived there. Floridanus was closely allied to (but considerably larger than) Tremarctos ornatus, the mainly-vegetarian “spectacled bear” which survives in South America.

Another predator living in end-Pleistocene North America, was the “cursorial” or running hyena Chasmaporthetes, which disappeared from Africa at about the same time that the sabertooths did – about 1.4 million years ago.

* * *

Twenty thousand years ago, this huge assortment of big carnivores was living off a much larger assortment of big herbivores. All the still-existing North American species such as moose, elk, caribou, white-tail and mule deer, musk ox, bison and wild sheep and goats were present of course, but there were, in addition, the two other species of bison I mentioned a few paragraphs back; a woodland musk ox named Bootherium; a “shrub-ox” called Euceratherium; an extinct relative of the still-living mountain goat Oreamnos; a “stilt-legged” deer called Sangamona; a medium-sized one called Navahoceros; a caribou-like deer named Torontoceros; a moose-like deer called Cervalces and a very large moose-variant named Bretzia. Unglaciated pieces of North America’s northern end were inhabited, too, by the saiga, an antelope which still survives in Eurasia.

If we could use a time-machine to travel to the North America of this time, we’d be able to see, too, the varied suite of “antilocaprids” i.e. the pronghorn and forked-horn “antelope” species which I mentioned in connection with America’s cheetahs. Just as present-day visitors to East Africa’s game parks might argue about whether they’re watching Thompson’s gazelle, Grant’s gazelle, Roberts’ gazelle or Rainey’s gazelle, we might, on such a time-trip, get into lively discussions about whether we were looking at Matthew’s pronghorn (Capromeryx furcifer), the little pronghorn (C. minor), the Mexican little pronghorn (C. mexicana), Shuler’s pronghorn (Tetrameryx shuleri), Mooser’s pronghorn (T. mooseri), Conklin’s pronghorn, (Stockoceros conklingae) or Quentin’s pronghorn (S. onusrosagris).

We could get into the same kind of arguments about the camel-llama suborder Tylopoda which was represented in its North American homeland by three genera at this time: the genus Camelops, represented by perhaps three species, and two llama-like genera called Paleolama and Hemiauchenia, which may also have contained multiple species.

Three peccary or “New World pig” species still live in the Americas: the collared peccary (or “javelina”), the white-lipped peccary, and the recently-discovered Chacoan peccary Catagonus (which was first identified by late-Pleistocene sub-fossils in the thirties). During the late Pleistocene, there were two additional species: a long-nosed, long-legged peccary called Mylohyus, and a large, “flat-headed” species called Platygonus compressus. Platygonus’ remains have been found at about 130 sites throughout North America, and it may well have been that continent’s commonest medium-sized mammal.

Peccaries and cheetahs were “naturalized” Americans, i.e. animals that had come to North America early in their evolutionary history, but the camel-llama suborder Tylopoda, the “pronghorn” or antilocaprid family, and the Perissodactyl order (i.e. horses, tapirs, rhinoceroses and chalicotheres) were North American born and bred.

Rhinoceroses disappeared from their North American homeland about five million years ago. The disappearance of this and a great many other animal groups from North America during the late Miocene was caused by the drop in the planet’s average temperature which had been taking place throughout the latter part of that Epoch, and accelerated about five million years ago. North America was, even after that temperature-drop, still a warmer continent than it is today, but its rainfall dropped sufficiently to stimulate the evolution and spread of grasses, including tough, fibrous “C4” species.

This cooling and drying trend, and the accompanying rise of grasslands, was a world-wide phenomenon, but it seems to have brought about a particularly large number of extinctions in North America. That might have resulted (as I suggest in the appendix to this book) from the fact that North America lacked the relatively warm, relatively moist tropical refuges retained by Africa, Eurasia, and South America. (As we’ve seen, North America had not yet become joined to South America when this Miocene cooling took place.)

The early Miocene saw the ending, too, of a relatively long period of isolation for North America, by starting the periodic openings of the Bering land bridge which have been going on ever since that time. This let in successive waves of Eurasian invaders such as proboscideans, bovids, cervids and felids which may have compounded the difficulties which climatic and vegetational change was causing for North America’s “autochthons” or native species.

Long before the North American rhinoceroses became extinct, at least one of its members had dispersed into the Old World (where rhinoceroses have, of course, survived into the present). That “emigration” took place in the Oligocene Epoch some thirty million years ago. North America may still have been connected to Scandinavia via Greenland at that time. Rhinoceroses could, therefore, have used a “Greenland bridge,” to get to Eurasia and beyond. (As we’ll see in Chapter 20, in the appendix to this book, Greenland literally was a “green land” at that time.)

While the perissodactyl group lost all of its rhinoceroses and chalicotheres (more about the latter in Chapter 12) in North America, some members of its horse and tapir groups survived.

During the late Pleistocene, three species of tapir lived in North America – Tapiris veroensis, T. copei, and T. californicus. Four members of this genus still exist: three in South and Central America, and one in Malaysia (which it reached via the Bering Bridge).

Of the twelve genera of equids, or horse-like animals, that had been in existence at the beginning of the Miocene, only three survived to the end of that epoch. North America’s mammalian diversity started growing again, however, in the later Pliocene and the Pleistocene. During that time, one of the “horse-like” genera that had survived the Miocene extinction, Equus, evolved a rich diversity of species in North America. By the end of the Pleistocene, Equus was – along with the two other surviving genera, Hippidion and Onohippidium – also present in South America.

We can divide the still-existing members of the genus Equus into

(1) Caballines or “true horses,” which includes the domestic horse Equus caballus and a wild species called E. pzewalskii;

(2) Hemionines or Asiatic wild asses which include Kiangs, Onagers, Kulans and Khurs;

(3) Asinids (the Nubian wild ass Equus asinus asinus, and the domesticated donkey derived from it, as well as the Somali wild ass E. a. somalicus); and

(4) Zebrines, which include the large, mule-like Grevy’s zebra, Burchell’s zebra (divided into three subspecies including the partly-striped, extinct quagga), and the ass-like mountain zebra (represented by two subspecies).

Greg McDonald, a vertebrate paleontologist with U.S. National Park Service, thinks that the “horse” species abundantly represented in the Hagerman fossil beds in Idaho where he is stationed, Equus simplicidens, was a close relative of Grevy’s zebra. It’s widely assumed, too, that the smallest of the American “horses,” E. tau, was a “pigmy onager”; that E. calobates was a “stilt-legged onager”; and that E. conversidens (whose human-butchered remains have been discovered in association with Clovis spear-points on the drained bed of St. Mary’s reservoir in southern Alberta) was a kind of ass.

I’m fully persuaded that ass-like, zebra-like, onager-like and/or horse-like characteristics were scattered among the New World’s diverse equine species. I would have to be guided, however, through a “multivariate” analysis of the relevant specimens by someone like my friend James Brink of the Florisbad Quaternary Institute in Bloemfontein, who has a special interest in equine paleontology, before I could presume to affirm or deny that one or another of the American equine species was identical or close to a particular, still-living member of the genus Equus.

How many horse-like species were there in the New World at the end of the Pleistocene? FaunMap, an electronic database documenting the late Quaternary distribution of mammals in the United States, developed at the Illinois State Museum and directed by Russel Graham and Ernest Lundelius, lists seventeen North American equines. (Let me add uncritically, though, that the creators of FaunMap, who also list five North American mammoth species, espouse the “splitting,” as opposed to the “lumping,” end of taxonomic thinking.)

Despite its wealth of species, the entire Equus genus disappeared from the New World at the end of the Pleistocene, along with the South American equids Hippidion and Onohippidium. The horses later used by American Indians were, therefore, the descendants of animals imported from Europe. Horses were, with that importation, completing a journey around the planet by returning to the continent on which they’d originally evolved.

Equid species had been spreading into Eurasia since this family first arose in North America early in the Age of Mammals some fifty million years ago. The next-to-last wave of equid emigration washed into the Old World with the arrival of three-toed horses or “hipparions” in the late Miocene some ten or twelve million years ago. Together with the remains of antelope species found in association with it, the cutmarked femur of a hipparion, unearthed at Bouri in Ethiopia in the late 1990s, constitutes proof that the human-like beings we’ll meet in Chapters 9 and 10 were already using stone tools for the purpose of butchery in the Late Pliocene, 2.5 million years ago. As we’ll see in Chapter 12, hipparions became extinct in Africa about a million years ago.

We mustn’t, of course, imagine that biological traffic flowed only one way over the Beringian “land bridge” which Equus and other American groups used to reach Asia. Many African and Eurasian species crossed it in the opposite direction to establish themselves in the New World (and some of those recrossed it thereafter). Old World immigrants to the New World include bison and other bovids, deer and cat species, as well as several kinds of elephant. At least seven elephant-like or “proboscidean” species, divided into three families, (each of which had evolved in Africa) were living in the New World when our species first entered it.

The mammoth family was represented by at least three species. The Eurasian woolly mammoth Mammuthus premigenius had settled the northern parts of North America late in the Pleistocene. One or more waves of mammoths had, however, spilled into North America near the beginning of the Pleistocene some 1.8 million years ago. The descendants of these “early arriving” mammoths were, by the end of that Epoch, living in great numbers in the southern, western and midwestern regions of that continent. Some paleontologists separate these early-arriving or “native” mammoths into two or even three species, Mammuthus columbi, M. imperator and M. jeffersoni, but the current trend is to place them all into the columbi taxon.

I’ll follow that trend, and talk about all America’s “native” mammoths as M. columbi. We’re prepared, after all, to see all African elephants as members of the single species Loxodonta africana, even though they’re a very variable group. L. africana has a “savanna” subspecies L. africana africana, and a somewhat smaller and very different-looking “forest” subspecies, L. a. cyclotes. Some zoologists recognize the West African pygmy elephant – which is only about six and a half feet tall at the shoulder – as a separate species which they would call Loxodonta pumilo, but most would classify it as an even smaller variant of cyclotes. Another very small elephant – about the size of the pygmy elephant – is reported to have occurred until very recently in Mauritania. At the other extreme, the desert elephants of the Kaokoveld in Namibia, with a shoulder height of up to 13 feet, tend to be even taller than “standard” savanna elephants like those found in the Kruger and Serengeti National Parks.

Columbian mammoths had probably evolved a comparable radiation of subspecies by the end of the Pleistocene. These “native” mammoths may have been relatively hairless, or they could have been sparsely-haired like Sumatran rhinos. Their tusks could, as we saw in Chapter 4, grow to an astonishing sixteen feet in length. (The longest African elephant tusk on record measured eleven feet, five inches.) Columbian mammoths reached a larger size than both woolly mammoths and African elephants. Big African elephants weigh about 12,000 lb, and the biggest ones reach 15,000 lb. The biggest Columbian mammoths probably exceeded 20,000 pounds. The smallest Columbian or “native” mammoth we know of, was, however, even smaller than West Africa’s “pygmy” elephant. Assigned to the separate species Mammuthus exilis because of this dramatic size difference, this animal had become dwarfed after reaching, and living on, the channel islands off what is now Santa Barbara on the coast of southern California.

The mastodont family had moved out of Africa/Eurasia into North America in the late Miocene some 3.5 to 4 million years ago. By the time humans reached that continent, only one of its members, Mammut americanus, was living there. The grinding surface of mastodonts’ cheek teeth consisted, as we saw in Chapter 4, of breast-like bumps or cones. Those simple, enamel-covered cones stood in sharp contrast to closely-packed plates of buried enamel which gave the “loxodont” cheek-teeth of mammoths their grass-resistant qualities.

While it’s clear, therefore, that M. americanus had simpler cheek-teeth than mammoths did, it may have had a relatively complex liver. Specialist browsers are usually confronted with many more kinds of potentially edible plants than grazers are, and commonly evolve livers which are sophisticated enough to detoxify the wide range of the “defense-poisons” to which this catholic diet exposes them. Livers don’t, however, fossilize the way teeth do, so we can only speculate that this may have been the case with M. americanus.

Preserved stomach contents confirm, at any rate, that the American mastodont was a specialist browser, whose diet included the twigs and leaves or needles of spruce, pine, larch and cedar trees. As one might expect, therefore, americanus was the commonest elephant in the forests of what is today the eastern United States. It was, however, widely distributed throughout North America, and its remains have been found as far south as Honduras. Standing about eight feet tall at the shoulder, it was about two-thirds as tall as a Columbian mammoth, but its body was as long or longer than that of the mammoth. Like those of the premigenius mammoth, the bodies of American mastodonts were covered with hair.

The third American elephant family, the gomphotheres, had arrived in North America as long ago as fifteen million years ago, near the middle of the Miocene Epoch. Gomphotheres could not, of course, have entered South America at this early stage, because that continent would only come into contact with North America just over three million years ago. By the time humans arrived in the New World, most (if not all) of the members of the gomphothere family had, however, become restricted to South America: Cuvieronius hyodon seems to have lived in the colder, more elevated regions of that continent, while Stegomastodon waringi and S. platensis inhabited its warmer, lowland regions.

The cheek-teeth of the gomphotheres were broadly similar to those of the “breast toothed” mastodont, but they were covered with a somewhat thicker layer of enamel whose surface area was increased by “folds” or “wrinkles.” Stable isotope studies tell us that, at least in some areas, gomphothere species combined browsing with grazing. This unspecialized feeding pattern may explain why gomphotheres had, by the end of the Pleistocene, been displaced in North America by mastodonts and mammoths (which were both, as we’ve seen, specialist feeders). If humans had somehow disappeared off the face of the earth 15,000 years ago, those two specialists might eventually have displaced the gompotheres from their South American sanctuary too.

 

 

Chapter 6 -
Lost Serengetis 3: North America concluded; South America; the fact that big animals don't go into oblivion alone.